<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: England bans death sticks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/02/15/england-bans-death-sticks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/02/15/england-bans-death-sticks/</link>
	<description>World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/02/15/england-bans-death-sticks/comment-page-1/#comment-5921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=369#comment-5921</guid>
		<description>Er hm. I also agree with the ban, sort of (in that I don&#039;t disagree). This statement is curious:

&quot;This isn’t a civil liberties issue either because my rights as a non-smoker outweigh those of smokers in this matter.&quot;

Why do they? The only reason they do is because there are more nonsmokers than smokers. You probably would think someone who kicked up a fuss about having to breathe pollution while walking next to a motorway would be an idiot, but if you take the time to deconstruct the thinking behind both examples, it&#039;s remarkably similar. Except that because most people drive, it&#039;s accepted.

This should be setting off civil liberties alarm bells all over the place, not nullifying them just because the ban happens to not affect you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er hm. I also agree with the ban, sort of (in that I don&#8217;t disagree). This statement is curious:</p>
<p>&#8220;This isn’t a civil liberties issue either because my rights as a non-smoker outweigh those of smokers in this matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why do they? The only reason they do is because there are more nonsmokers than smokers. You probably would think someone who kicked up a fuss about having to breathe pollution while walking next to a motorway would be an idiot, but if you take the time to deconstruct the thinking behind both examples, it&#8217;s remarkably similar. Except that because most people drive, it&#8217;s accepted.</p>
<p>This should be setting off civil liberties alarm bells all over the place, not nullifying them just because the ban happens to not affect you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trj</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/02/15/england-bans-death-sticks/comment-page-1/#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>trj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=369#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>Tobacco is legal. I should have every right to go to a bar and smoke. You should have every right to choose which bars to go into.

Liberty is about choice.

Frankly, fuck you. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tobacco is legal. I should have every right to go to a bar and smoke. You should have every right to choose which bars to go into.</p>
<p>Liberty is about choice.</p>
<p>Frankly, fuck you. <img src='http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
