<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why automatically push to rawhide?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/</link>
	<description>World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casey Dahlin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/comment-page-1/#comment-133219</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Dahlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=921#comment-133219</guid>
		<description>If you only want to play with the package yourself, you need to do a scratch build. Regular builds are only to build packages intended to go into the distro. Conceptually  I think that&#039;s enough, but perhaps the UI should encourage scratch builds first and make regular builds seem more like the exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you only want to play with the package yourself, you need to do a scratch build. Regular builds are only to build packages intended to go into the distro. Conceptually  I think that&#8217;s enough, but perhaps the UI should encourage scratch builds first and make regular builds seem more like the exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Keating</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/comment-page-1/#comment-133218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=921#comment-133218</guid>
		<description>It has been the plan since the start of the AutoQA effort (a few years ago at a FUDCon in Boston) that there would be a layer of AutoQA between a build completing, and a build being tagged for public consumption.  If you wish to get this in place sooner, please donate some time to the AutoQA project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been the plan since the start of the AutoQA effort (a few years ago at a FUDCon in Boston) that there would be a layer of AutoQA between a build completing, and a build being tagged for public consumption.  If you wish to get this in place sooner, please donate some time to the AutoQA project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/comment-page-1/#comment-133214</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=921#comment-133214</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what --scratch  is all about ... or local sanity checks before Koji submission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what &#8211;scratch  is all about &#8230; or local sanity checks before Koji submission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kofler</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/comment-page-1/#comment-133211</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kofler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=921#comment-133211</guid>
		<description>We can&#039;t do any actual development that way.

You cannot require us to run Rawhide. How can I do development if my development machine does not work?

It&#039;s already enough of a PITA to have to deal with Bodhi for released distributions, doing it for Rawhide would break Fedora development entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can&#8217;t do any actual development that way.</p>
<p>You cannot require us to run Rawhide. How can I do development if my development machine does not work?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s already enough of a PITA to have to deal with Bodhi for released distributions, doing it for Rawhide would break Fedora development entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bochecha</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2010/12/08/why-automatically-push-to-rawhide/comment-page-1/#comment-133205</link>
		<dc:creator>bochecha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=921#comment-133205</guid>
		<description>I kind of agree, since I&#039;d love to be able to use Rawhide on a regular basis, which isn&#039;t really possible at the moment.

However, I think a much bigger problem is when someone builds a package that will land in Rawhide the next day, breaking everything that depends on this package because the maintainer didn&#039;t bother rebuilding them all together or ask for a custom tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of agree, since I&#8217;d love to be able to use Rawhide on a regular basis, which isn&#8217;t really possible at the moment.</p>
<p>However, I think a much bigger problem is when someone builds a package that will land in Rawhide the next day, breaking everything that depends on this package because the maintainer didn&#8217;t bother rebuilding them all together or ask for a custom tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
