Comments on: Warrentless wiretapping is unconstitutional http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/08/18/warrentless-wiretapping-is-unconstitutional/ World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:35:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Pete Zaitcev http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/08/18/warrentless-wiretapping-is-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-24018 Pete Zaitcev Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:52:52 +0000 http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=448#comment-24018 So, the bastion of Bush-hatred, New York Times, posted an article which basically says that it was a crappy ruling. It quotes Suntein and Volokh. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/19/washington/19ruling.html?_r=1&hp&ex=1155960000&en=359d009508f66aa4&ei=5094&partner=homepage&oref=slogin You want BBC doing the same before you see that Taylor handed down a very poor decision? So, the bastion of Bush-hatred, New York Times, posted an article which basically says that it was a crappy ruling. It quotes Suntein and Volokh.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/19/washington/19ruling.html?_r=1&hp&ex=1155960000&en=359d009508f66aa4&ei=5094&partner=homepage&oref=slogin

You want BBC doing the same before you see that Taylor handed down a very poor decision?

]]> By: Pete Zaitcev http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2006/08/18/warrentless-wiretapping-is-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-23649 Pete Zaitcev Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:56:59 +0000 http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=448#comment-23649 It's amazing that you're so convinced, considering that best legal scholars in the country cannot figure this out (e.g. warrantless search at borders was long held constitutional, yet the district court did not even mention that in the opinion). Volokh.com is spit in half with Orin being for yet claiming that plaintiffs have no standing, etc. Curiously though, Eugene Volokh himself while being the foremost champion of privacy and 1st Amendment is against (e.g. for Bush). I'd say that for a computer programmer to spit "fuckwits" left and right only goes to show how clueless he is about the facts of the matter and how he lets his prior belief to override the same facts. It’s amazing that you’re so convinced, considering that best legal scholars in the country cannot figure this out (e.g. warrantless search at borders was long held constitutional, yet the district court did not even mention that in the opinion). Volokh.com is spit in half with Orin being for yet claiming that plaintiffs have no standing, etc. Curiously though, Eugene Volokh himself while being the foremost champion of privacy and 1st Amendment is against (e.g. for Bush). I’d say that for a computer programmer to spit “fuckwits” left and right only goes to show how clueless he is about the facts of the matter and how he lets his prior belief to override the same facts.

]]>