<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush: $2.9 trillion mostly spent on FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/02/05/bush-29-trillion-mostly-spent-on-fud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/02/05/bush-29-trillion-mostly-spent-on-fud/</link>
	<description>World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Zaitcev</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/02/05/bush-29-trillion-mostly-spent-on-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-56199</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Zaitcev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 05:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=499#comment-56199</guid>
		<description>You lost your marbles, my friend. I see no other explanation to the parroting of leftist propaganda which happens in the above article. I am about to try to inject a little dissent into your Bostonian echo chamber, then it&#039;ll be your choice to hear it or not.

For one thing, the Islamist war on the West was not Bush 41&#039;s war. In fact, if Bush 41st was a bit less of a doormat and more like his son, we might&#039;ve not even needed to obliterate Iran. Which seems pretty inevitable now, more the pity.

Also, Bush&#039;s tax cuts made tax receipts to hit all time high, and deficit shrinking rapidly. And you want him to [ask the Congress to] increase taxes? Please. If that happened, all those needy would receive LESS money, not more. Of if we turned the knob, they&#039;d receive MORE useless cut paper, but it would&#039;ve been worth LESS. Increasing taxes on &quot;the rich&quot; only hurts the needy, because it shrinks the pie from which we are all eating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lost your marbles, my friend. I see no other explanation to the parroting of leftist propaganda which happens in the above article. I am about to try to inject a little dissent into your Bostonian echo chamber, then it&#8217;ll be your choice to hear it or not.</p>
<p>For one thing, the Islamist war on the West was not Bush 41&#8217;s war. In fact, if Bush 41st was a bit less of a doormat and more like his son, we might&#8217;ve not even needed to obliterate Iran. Which seems pretty inevitable now, more the pity.</p>
<p>Also, Bush&#8217;s tax cuts made tax receipts to hit all time high, and deficit shrinking rapidly. And you want him to [ask the Congress to] increase taxes? Please. If that happened, all those needy would receive LESS money, not more. Of if we turned the knob, they&#8217;d receive MORE useless cut paper, but it would&#8217;ve been worth LESS. Increasing taxes on &#8220;the rich&#8221; only hurts the needy, because it shrinks the pie from which we are all eating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
