<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything you know about interrupts is wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/12/12/everything-you-know-about-interrupts-is-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/12/12/everything-you-know-about-interrupts-is-wrong/</link>
	<description>World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tan Wei Chong</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/12/12/everything-you-know-about-interrupts-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-132770</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Wei Chong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=641#comment-132770</guid>
		<description>&quot;(MSI interrupts always have high numbers, like 8406, on Linux anyway).&quot;
Can you elaborate more on why is that? And how is the number determined?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(MSI interrupts always have high numbers, like 8406, on Linux anyway).&#8221;<br />
Can you elaborate more on why is that? And how is the number determined?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Zaitcev</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/2007/12/12/everything-you-know-about-interrupts-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-115186</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Zaitcev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmasters.org/blog/?p=641#comment-115186</guid>
		<description>Interrupts were threaded in Solaris back when I hacked on it, that is... 2.5.1 or so. Put it to 1999 or about that. Frankly I&#039;m not convinced of their merits and it was very clear that the whole idea was pushed by RT and low-lat people  (this is the area where Solaris was way ahead of Linux as well... their glacial pace of development in the little proprietary world allowed us to catch up).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interrupts were threaded in Solaris back when I hacked on it, that is&#8230; 2.5.1 or so. Put it to 1999 or about that. Frankly I&#8217;m not convinced of their merits and it was very clear that the whole idea was pushed by RT and low-lat people  (this is the area where Solaris was way ahead of Linux as well&#8230; their glacial pace of development in the little proprietary world allowed us to catch up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
